erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agobottom rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up1501arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1492arrow-down1imagebottom rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square20linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaretedd_deireadh@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 months agoThanks for posting the full quote. Still, it’s not much better. Even if queer folk only made up 3% of the population, did Pat not consider that straight people would support them? Perhaps even a significant portion of the population?
minus-squareTheTechnician27@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·2 months agoOh, the quote is rancid; it’s just not readily exploitable into a sex joke about Pat Robertson.
minus-squareTiresia@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoCounterpoint: the OP readily exploited it into a sex joke about Pat Robinson.
minus-squareTheTechnician27@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months ago“It” is doing Atlas-level lifting in this sentence unless completely changing a quote and then making a sex joke about that straw quote counts. Counterpoint: OP readily includes Pat Robertson’s sex life in their exploits.
Thanks for posting the full quote. Still, it’s not much better. Even if queer folk only made up 3% of the population, did Pat not consider that straight people would support them? Perhaps even a significant portion of the population?
Oh, the quote is rancid; it’s just not readily exploitable into a sex joke about Pat Robertson.
Counterpoint: the OP readily exploited it into a sex joke about Pat Robinson.
“It” is doing Atlas-level lifting in this sentence unless completely changing a quote and then making a sex joke about that straw quote counts.