https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pictures_for_Sad_Children
In some ways “outdated”, too edgy, but in some details maybe even more relevant today than it originally was.
(1/3 of humanity having no electricity is a bit exaggerated, in 2000 it was 1/5.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pictures_for_Sad_Children
In some ways “outdated”, too edgy, but in some details maybe even more relevant today than it originally was.
(1/3 of humanity having no electricity is a bit exaggerated, in 2000 it was 1/5.)
The first half of this comic started to have a point, but kinda lost me as soon as the author started condemning the idea of having hobbies.
we’ve finally come full circle from “haha nerds are awkward losers!” through “actually nerds are fine” to “haha nerds are just straight up ontologically bad!”
The comic is from >10 years ago (ran 2007‐2014).
And was wrong then too. Extremely. Techbros existed back then too.
This is bringing real criticism of a group and blaming it on another group. It’s bad.
Some might claim it’s more relevant today than it originally was
Some would be very obviously wrong